• Therapeutic Cataract & Refractive
  • Lens Technology
  • Glasses
  • Ptosis
  • Comprehensive Eye Exams
  • AMD
  • COVID-19
  • DME
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Optic Relief
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Cornea
  • Conjunctivitis
  • Myopia
  • Presbyopia
  • Allergy
  • Nutrition
  • Pediatrics
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Contact Lenses
  • Lid and Lash
  • Dry Eye
  • Glaucoma
  • Refractive Surgery
  • Comanagement
  • Blepharitis
  • OCT
  • Patient Care
  • Diabetic Eye Disease
  • Technology

Many frequent replacement contact lens wearers 'stretch' prescribed replacement intervals


The majority of patients wearing frequent replacement contact lenses are not compliant with their prescribed replacement schedule.

Key Points

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care sponsored the survey. However, the participants were randomly selected from a panel of U.S. consumers who volunteered to take part in online surveys about a variety of products and were unaware that the information in this survey was being sought by a contact lens manufacturer.

A total of 448 consumers wearing hydrogel contact lenses and 197 consumers with silicone hydrogel contact lenses provided answers to a series of questions about replacement frequency.

Minor stretching was identified among 65% of persons in the 2-week replacement group and 55% of those in the 4-week replacement group (p = 0.02), whereas 4% of patients in the 2-week group and 23% of those in the 4-week/monthly group displayed extreme stretching (waiting ≥8 weeks) to replace their lenses (p <0.01).

"There continues to be debate in the industry about the optimum replacement schedule for soft contact lenses," said Sheila B. Hickson-Curran, BSc (Hons), MCOptom, FAAO, Director of Medical Affairs, VISTAKON, Division of Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.

Taking sides

"While there is good science to suggest that more frequent replacement is better for optical performance, patient comfort, and ocular health, there are advocates for a longer replacement interval based on the idea that reduced frequency of replacement would improve replacement compliance," Hickson-Curran said.

"The results of this survey reaffirm that noncompliance with prescriber's instructions is an important issue among contact lens wearers," she continued. "They are also consistent with the old adage, 'Give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile.' It's counterintuitive that patients who are noncompliant with a 2-week replacement schedule will be more adherent to instructions if allowed to wait 4 weeks to change lenses.

"Furthermore, noncompliance with a 4-week replacement schedule may put patients on a slippery slope leading to significant problems," Hickson-Curran said.

"Therefore, when noncompliance with frequent replacement is an issue, switching to single-use lenses is probably a better alternative because there are good data to show that vision, comfort, and safety are best with these products that avoid the need for cleaning/disinfection solutions, storage cases, and remembering about replacement."

Related Videos
Raman Bhakhri, OD, FAAO, overviews his talk on medications' potential side effects on the retina with Optometry Times
Jacobi Cleaver, OD, FAAO
Jade Coats, OD, overviews a lecture on ocular pain and patient care
Jade Coats, OD, outlines two poster presentations she gave on a novel lipid-containing eye drop at the AOA Optometry's Meeting
Adam Alexander, OD, chats with Optometry Times about his AOA e-poster presentation on Miebo
Lorraine Provencher, MD, presenting slides
Megan Cavet, PhD
Nazlee Zebardast, MD, MSc, overviews her ARVO 2024 presentations on glaucoma and polygenic risk scores
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.