Community Health Centers in poor, rural communities lack vision care services

Article

The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services study, "Assessing the Need for On-Site Eye Care Professionals in Community Health Centers," found that the absence of eye-care services in rural and low-income areas is a major public health crisis that puts individuals at greater risk for undiagnosed and untreated eye and vision problems.

Key Points

Washington, DC-The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services study, "Assessing the Need for On-Site Eye Care Professionals in Community Health Centers," found that the absence of eye-care services in rural and low-income areas is a major public health crisis that puts individuals at greater risk for undiagnosed and untreated eye and vision problems. A full 70% of community health centers do not offer on-site vision care services, the analysis found, because of cost; difficulties with Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance reimbursement; and discrepancies in Medicaid coverage and benefits across states.

"The American Optometric Association [AOA] is committed to increasing access to eye care for all Americans," said Dr. Barry Barresi, executive director of the AOA. "We have a responsibility to help ensure that essential primary eye care services are offered at these facilities. Greater access to preventive eye care can lead to diagnosis and treatment before loss of vision becomes severe or untreatable."

The AOA has joined with the National Association of Community Health Centers, the New England Eye Institute, and the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers to advocate for access to high-quality, comprehensive, affordable vision care for medically underserved populations in community health centers.

Health care advocates advise that a more detailed evaluation of the type and quality of eye care should be conducted to help health centers identify cost-effective practices and evaluate the cost of vision health. Experts also advise that additional research should be conducted to assess the value of having an eye care professional on-site and the impact on reducing or eliminating vision disparities.

Newsletter

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to Optometry Times and get clinical pearls and practice tips delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Videos
Rhue and Canto-Sims talk the value of contact lens patients, financial insights, and key benefits of implementing a contact lens management system.
Eva Kim, MD, shares visual outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens in patients with low to moderate myopia
Drs Brianna Rhue and Diana Canto-Sims discuss the benefits of implementing a contact lens management system that can help improve lens sales at your practice.
Dr Ashley Wallace Tucker speaks on the Myopia Management Navigator.
Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD; detailed what optometrists can expect to change when HB 1353's regulations are enacted later this year.
Arkansas Optometric Association legislative cochairs Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD, discuss their involvement in their bill and provide context for its relevance.
Elise Kramer, OD, FAAO, FSLS, describes her take on a multidisciplinary approach to dry eye
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, shares pearls on spotting red flags in need of referral and enhancing patient care with follow-up compliance.
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, detailed a lecture she gave at the NOA Midwestern Symposium earlier this month.
CRU 2025 provided the latest insights regarding glaucoma, dry eye disease, retina, myopia, neurotrophic keratitis, and keratoconus.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.