• Therapeutic Cataract & Refractive
  • Lens Technology
  • Glasses
  • Ptosis
  • Comprehensive Eye Exams
  • AMD
  • COVID-19
  • DME
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Optic Relief
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Cornea
  • Conjunctivitis
  • Myopia
  • Presbyopia
  • Allergy
  • Nutrition
  • Pediatrics
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Contact Lenses
  • Lid and Lash
  • Dry Eye
  • Glaucoma
  • Refractive Surgery
  • Comanagement
  • Blepharitis
  • OCT
  • Patient Care
  • Diabetic Eye Disease
  • Technology

FTC sues 1-800 Contacts, but not for the reasons you think


Many in the optometric community think that the lawsuit was a long time coming, but the lawsuit does not address the community’s primary concern-patient safety.

Washington, DC-The Federal Trade (FTC) commission announced that it has sued 1-800 Contacts, accusing the company of anticompetitive behavior.

The lawsuit alleges that 1-800 Contacts orchestrated and maintains a web of anticompetitive agreements with rival online contact lens retailers. These agreements allegedly suppress competition in certain online search advertising auctions and restrict truthful and non-misleading Internet advertising to customers.

The FTC claims these practices result in some customers paying higher retail prices for contact lenses.

Related: 1-800 Contacts ramps up legislative fight

According to the FTC’s administrative complaint, 1-800 Contacts entered into bidding agreements with at least 14 competing online contact lens retailers that eliminate competition in auctions to place ads on the search results page generated by online search engines like Google or Bing.

“1-800 Contacts strongly disagrees with the FTC’s contention that our settlement agreements are anticompetitive,” 1-800 Contacts General Counsel Cindy Williams told Optometry Times. “Our settlement agreements were specifically designed to protect our intellectual property rights. “

The administrative trial is scheduled to begin April 11, 2017.

Following the lawsuit announcement, American Optometric Association (AOA) President Andrea Thau, OD, FAAO, FCOVD, DPNAP, released a statement commending the FTC for taking action against 1-800 Contacts and affirmed the organization’s commitment to holding online contact lens retailers accountable.

Related: AOA asks FTC to address contact lens retail abuses

Last fall, the AOA asked the FTC to strengthen its Contact Lens Rule in order to address online contact lens retail abuses, and it has been battling 1-800 Contacts at the state and federal level.

Related: 1-800 Contacts ramps up legislative fight

The American Academy of Optometry chose not to comment on the lawsuit.


Lawsuit will not address patient safety

Many in the optometric community think that the lawsuit was a long time coming, but the lawsuit does not address the community’s primary concern-patient safety.

“First,” says Craig Steinberg, OD, JD, in Agoura Hills, CA, “understand that this lawsuit is not about selling contact lenses without a prescription. There may be a tendency for optometrists to jump to that conclusion because that’s what concerns them the most.”

Jeffry Sonsino, OD, FAAO, chair of the AOA Contact Lens and Cornea Section (CLCS), noted the irony in the situation because 1-800 Contacts has often accused others in the industry of anticompetitive behavior.

“It is quite interesting that 1-800 Contacts has falsely accused the AOA and contact lens manufacturers of anticompetitive practices while the whole time, according to the FTC, allegedly practicing anticompetitive practices itself,” he says.

However, Williams says 1-800 Contacts has a long history of advocating for increased competition and consumer rights, pointing to the company’s support of the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act (FCLCA) of 2004 and its fight against contact lens manufacturers’ unilateral pricing polices (UPP), which she calls “price fixing.”

“1-800 Contacts strongly believes in a competitive contact lens marketplace and will continue to be a leading advocate for providing consumers with more choice, greater convenience, and lower prices,” she says.



What you can do

Dr. Steinberg says optometrists should not count on the FTC to make the changes necessary to protect patient health because its primary concern appears to be making sure consumers get the best price-not the best care. Instead, he encourages optometrists to support the AOA-backed Contact Lens Consumer Health Protection Act of 2016 (S 2777).

The bill would amend the FCLCA of 2004 to require contact lens retailers to provide a toll-free telephone number and email address that prescribers can use to ask questions about a seller’s prescription verification request.

S.B. 2777 is sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy, MD (R-LA).

1-800 Contacts strongly opposes the bill, so much so that it formed a coalition with Costco Wholesale and Lens.com-calling themselves the Coalition for Contact Lens Consumer Choice-in order to fight it.

In related news, 1-800 Contacts recently partnered with online refraction company Opternative to offer online prescriptions to its customers-much to the ire of optometrists across the country who claimed the companies were more concerned with a healthy bottom line than the health of their patients. 

Related: 1-800 Contacts now offers Opternative refraction to its customers

Dr. Sonsino says he hopes consumers ultimately hold the companies accountable for their bad behavior, calling the deal with Opternative an attempted to further skirt contact lens prescribing rules. 

Related Videos
Lorraine Provencher, MD, presenting slides
Megan Cavet, PhD
Nazlee Zebardast, MD, MSc, overviews her ARVO 2024 presentations on glaucoma and polygenic risk scores
Shelley Cutler, OD, FAAO, outlines her key takeaways from this year's IKA symposium
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.