Treatments evolve for retinal vein occlusions

Article

Vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular entity (diabetic retinopathy is the most common).

Key Points

In the past, treatment was limited to specific patients and showed modest efficacy.2,3 Recent clinical trials, however, have resulted in more frequent use of agents that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), intravitreal steroid injections, and FDA approval of a new steroid implant. These treatment options offer new hope for patients with macular edema secondary to central and branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO and BRVO, respectively).

Two of the largest studies that looked at the treatment of macular edema in patients with vein occlusion date back more than 20 years. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study (BVOS) and Central Vein Occlusion Study (CVOS) evaluated focal laser for the treatment of macular edema associated with BRVO and CRVO.2,3

The CVOS looked at subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/50 or poorer. Treated subjects showed angiographic evidence of improvement, but there was no improvement in visual acuity.3

Intravitreal steroid injection

Many small-scale studies and case reports show a potential benefit of intravitreal ster-oid injections for treating macular edema associated with BRVO and CRVO.4,5

To date, the Standard Care versus COrticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Trial is the largest study that has compared intravitreal steroid injection with standard-of-care treatment (macular grid laser for BRVO, observation for CRVO) for macular edema associated with vein occlusion. Researchers randomly assigned about 700 subjects to receive standard-of-care treatment, a 1-mg intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog), or 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Subjects were evaluated and re-treatment was assessed every 4 months.6,7

The SCORE-BRVO 3-year study determined that laser was most effective for treating macular edema associated with BRVO. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome when comparing patients who received intravitreal steroid injection with those treated with laser. At 3 years, 29% of the patients treated with laser experienced three or more lines in improved visual acuity, as did 26% of those who received 1 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and 27% of those who received 4 mg.6 Also, there was a greater incidence of cataract formation and increased IOP among patients treated with steroids.6

Newsletter

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to Optometry Times and get clinical pearls and practice tips delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Videos
Brett Bielory, MD, at ASCRS 2025
At ASCRS 2025, Alex Hacopian, MD, shares information from his presentation on next-gen presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.
Rhue and Canto-Sims talk the value of contact lens patients, financial insights, and key benefits of implementing a contact lens management system.
Eva Kim, MD, shares visual outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens in patients with low to moderate myopia
Drs Brianna Rhue and Diana Canto-Sims discuss the benefits of implementing a contact lens management system that can help improve lens sales at your practice.
Dr Ashley Wallace Tucker speaks on the Myopia Management Navigator.
Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD; detailed what optometrists can expect to change when HB 1353's regulations are enacted later this year.
Arkansas Optometric Association legislative cochairs Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD, discuss their involvement in their bill and provide context for its relevance.
Elise Kramer, OD, FAAO, FSLS, describes her take on a multidisciplinary approach to dry eye
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, shares pearls on spotting red flags in need of referral and enhancing patient care with follow-up compliance.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.